--- code/trunk/ChangeLog 2007/02/24 21:38:09 7 +++ code/trunk/ChangeLog 2007/02/24 21:38:13 9 @@ -2,6 +2,52 @@ ------------------ +Version 1.03 18-Dec-97 +---------------------- + +1. A erroneous regex with a missing opening parenthesis was correctly +diagnosed, but PCRE attempted to access brastack[-1], which could cause crashes +on some systems. + +2. Replaced offsetof(real_pcre, code) by offsetof(real_pcre, code[0]) because +it was reported that one broken compiler failed on the former because "code" is +also an independent variable. + +3. The erroneous regex a[]b caused an array overrun reference. + +4. A regex ending with a one-character negative class (e.g. /[^k]$/) did not +fail on data ending with that character. (It was going on too far, and checking +the next character, typically a binary zero.) This was specific to the +optimized code for single-character negative classes. + +5. Added a contributed patch from the TIN world which does the following: + + + Add an undef for memmove, in case the the system defines a macro for it. + + + Add a definition of offsetof(), in case there isn't one. (I don't know + the reason behind this - offsetof() is part of the ANSI standard - but + it does no harm). + + + Reduce the ifdef's in pcre.c using macro DPRINTF, thereby eliminating + most of the places where whitespace preceded '#'. I have given up and + allowed the remaining 2 cases to be at the margin. + + + Rename some variables in pcre to eliminate shadowing. This seems very + pedantic, but does no harm, of course. + +6. Moved the call to setjmp() into its own function, to get rid of warnings +from gcc -Wall, and avoided calling it at all unless PCRE_EXTRA is used. + +7. Constructs such as \d{8,} were compiling into the equivalent of +\d{8}\d{65527} instead of \d{8}\d* which didn't make much difference to the +outcome, but in this particular case used more store than had been allocated, +which caused the bug to be discovered because it threw up an internal error. + +8. The debugging code in both pcre and pcretest for outputting the compiled +form of a regex was going wrong in the case of back references followed by +curly-bracketed repeats. + + Version 1.02 12-Dec-97 ----------------------